Info
You are currently browsing the Public Sector Billing Blog weblog archives for November, 2010.
Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Oct | Jan » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
Categories
- product manager (7)
- projects (40)
- resourcing (4)
- software selection (2)
- tax billing software (33)
- vendors (49)
- water billing software (39)
Latest Postings
- 11. February 2012: The role of the regulator
- 19. April 2011: User groups
- 19. April 2011: Detecting theft
- 13. February 2011: Automated water meter reads
- 27. January 2011: What German utility billing software would that be?
- 5. November 2010: Seven myths of billing implementations
- 24. October 2010: Comparing utility billing software
- 1. October 2010: Failing in the public sector
- 29. September 2010: Project failures
- 27. September 2010: Not the product manager
Links
projects
Archives
Archive for November 2010
Seven myths of billing implementations
5. November 2010 by admin.
- Billing projects are IT projects
- Billing software is useful out of the box
- Billing vendors will provide all necessary project management skills
- I can manage my own billing project
- All billing systems are the same
- The budget for the project is the same as the quote I receive from the billing vendor
- I can put the people on the project the business will miss the least
Posted in resourcing, projects, vendors | Print | 1 Comment »
|