| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Jun | Aug » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
- product manager (7)
- projects (40)
- resourcing (4)
- software selection (1)
- tax billing software (32)
- vendors (49)
- water billing software (38)
- 19. April 2011: User groups
- 19. April 2011: Detecting theft
- 13. February 2011: Automated water meter reads
- 27. January 2011: What German utility billing software would that be?
- 5. November 2010: Seven myths of billing implementations
- 24. October 2010: Comparing utility billing software
- 1. October 2010: Failing in the public sector
- 29. September 2010: Project failures
- 27. September 2010: Not the product manager
- 25. September 2010: Not the product roadmap
projects
Let’s just pause a moment
Sometimes it’s worthwhile just to re-assess a project that’s going wrong. And that’s exactly what Veterans’ Affairs (VA) is doing. The Veterans Affairs Department is putting 45 information technology projects on hold — at least temporarily — while it figures out how to get them back on track. VA Secretary Eric Shinseki announced the decision today in a press release. He says the agency will evaluate the projects, which range from e-learning to document imaging to medical billing to health IT, to determine if they are worth continuing.
“VA has a responsibility to the American people, who are investing millions of dollars in technology projects, to deliver quality results that adhere to a budget and are delivered on time.” Shinseki says. “They need to have confidence that the dollars they are spending are being effectively used to improve the lives of our veterans.”
The projects are worth an estimated $200 million in fiscal 2009, according to the Office of Management and Budget. According to OMB’s IT dashboard Web site, VA lists 41 major investments worth $2.6 billion for 2009. Of those 41 major investments, 26 are considered at high risk, including 20 that are off schedule.
On Friday’s In Depth with Francis Rose, VA chief information officer Roger Baker outlined why the projects were put on hold and not simply terminated, “We are going to change things and try and bring them back on track. We still have a requirement for the things those projects are trying to accomplish.” Federal chief information officer Vivek Kundra says on a blog post that the worst offender of these 45 projects is “110 percent over budget and 17 months behind schedule.”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.