You are currently browsing the Public Sector Billing Blog weblog archives for the day 29. June 2009.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
- product manager (7)
- projects (40)
- resourcing (4)
- software selection (1)
- tax billing software (32)
- vendors (49)
- water billing software (38)
- 19. April 2011: User groups
- 19. April 2011: Detecting theft
- 13. February 2011: Automated water meter reads
- 27. January 2011: What German utility billing software would that be?
- 5. November 2010: Seven myths of billing implementations
- 24. October 2010: Comparing utility billing software
- 1. October 2010: Failing in the public sector
- 29. September 2010: Project failures
- 27. September 2010: Not the product manager
- 25. September 2010: Not the product roadmap
projects
Archive for 29. June 2009
Project problems
29. June 2009 by admin.
Implemented new tax billing software or water billing software recently? Does this sound familiar? “With the transition of a new software system, it’s difficult to know how soon the data input and conversion process will take”, Kopp said. What’s more, with the current workload, he needs more funding to hire part-time employees and his current full-time staff has to be paid overtime. That’s from the Post-Tribune’s story of June 28 about Porter County’s new tax billing software project. At the previous Tuesday’s the Porter County Council meeting County Auditor Jim Kopp raised doubts about the tentative goal to mail out the 2009 bills by early August which officials had agreed on at a previous council meeting.
Selecting the right software is only half the battle.
Posted in projects, tax billing software | Print | No Comments »