Info
You are currently browsing the Public Sector Billing Blog weblog archives for the day 26. June 2009.
Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « May | Jul » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | |||||
Categories
- product manager (7)
- projects (40)
- resourcing (4)
- software selection (1)
- tax billing software (32)
- vendors (49)
- water billing software (38)
Latest Postings
- 19. April 2011: User groups
- 19. April 2011: Detecting theft
- 13. February 2011: Automated water meter reads
- 27. January 2011: What German utility billing software would that be?
- 5. November 2010: Seven myths of billing implementations
- 24. October 2010: Comparing utility billing software
- 1. October 2010: Failing in the public sector
- 29. September 2010: Project failures
- 27. September 2010: Not the product manager
- 25. September 2010: Not the product roadmap
Links
projects
Archives
Archive for 26. June 2009
Customer references
26. June 2009 by admin.
The value of customer reference checks is debatable by many. It’s no secret that vendors have lists of special client relationships that are routinely used as references. These references are clearly biased and will only ever proclaim positive statements for the vendor. However, references in the public sector tend to be more objective and therefore worthwhile. One of the best sources of references is a user group rather than direct from a vendor.
Posted in vendors | Print | No Comments »
|