- product manager (7)
- projects (40)
- resourcing (4)
- software selection (1)
- tax billing software (32)
- vendors (49)
- water billing software (38)
- 19. April 2011: User groups
- 19. April 2011: Detecting theft
- 13. February 2011: Automated water meter reads
- 27. January 2011: What German utility billing software would that be?
- 5. November 2010: Seven myths of billing implementations
- 24. October 2010: Comparing utility billing software
- 1. October 2010: Failing in the public sector
- 29. September 2010: Project failures
- 27. September 2010: Not the product manager
- 25. September 2010: Not the product roadmap
projects
Scoring vs. analysis
Scoring’s limits should be recognised when it comes to comparing vendors. What does it mean that one vendor received an overall score of 90% and another 91%? Even reviewing raw percentages at a greater level of detail. Suppose there are two functional areas (A and B), and two vendors - each is weak where the other is strong. At the level at which most consultants report (A+B) the vendors appear to score equally. Even if the software buyer rates both A and B as equally important, a consultant who draws attention to the results rather than letting the purchaser find the results by poring over the details buried in the figures for each vendor is adding the sort of value for which consultants should be responsible - but often are not.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.